News Staff
A recent Town Hall spotlighted the future of the Berger Center as the OVA prepares to replace its aging boiler and chiller. On April 21, Energy Systems Group (ESG) joined the OVA board and members to present three potential paths forward. No decisions have been made — these options were offered strictly as possibilities for the board to evaluate.
VIDEO – 4-21-2026 Town Hall: Berger Center Audit & Assessment Update
Option 1 addresses infrastructure only: replacing the boiler and chiller and completing required code upgrades. This is the minimum scope of work required and would be fully covered by the Asset Replacement Fund (ARF) and Capital Improvement Fund (CIF), with no loan necessary.
Option 2 builds on Option 1 by bundling additional reserve study items into the same project. Combining this work can lower overall costs, reduce future disruptions, and minimize building downtime. The ARF and CIF would cover a portion of the expenses, with the remainder financed through a $2.7M loan.
Option 3 encompasses everything in Option 2, plus enhancements to the building’s layout and functionality — including reconfiguring Room G and adding approximately 1,000 square feet of space toward the plaza to better support events and gatherings. Like Option 2, it would be partially funded by the ARF and CIF, with a $4.0M loan covering the balance.
All three options include accessibility improvements and energy-efficient upgrades aimed at reducing long-term operating costs.
A cost analysis presented at the Town Hall outlined what each option would mean for member dues. OVA residents are currently paying down a $4.3M golf course loan, which adds $11.08 per month to dues. Option 1 would require no change to that figure. Options 2 and 3, however, would each require an additional loan, with corresponding dues increases.
Option 2’s $2.7M loan would add $2.32 per month, bringing the total loan-related dues to $13.40. Option 3’s $4.0M loan would add $5.22 per month, for a total of $16.30.
Community response to the ESG and OVA presentation was mixed. Some residents expressed concern about taking on new debt before the golf course loan is retired, while others voiced enthusiasm for upgrading a building that sees heavy use throughout the community.
Importantly, the board has not reached any decisions and recognizes that additional questions, research, and information are still needed. More details will be shared as the process progresses.
Keep up to date with this project here: Berger Assessment